An increasing body of research looks at the social, economic, political and cultural dynamics at play inside the select networks of transnational professionals, and their relevance to both local and global contexts. Much less work,...
moreAn increasing body of research looks at the social, economic, political and cultural dynamics at play inside the select networks of transnational professionals, and their relevance to both local and global contexts. Much less work, however, actually looks at the impact of a mobile and transient upbringing on the children of expatriates, who are often referred to as ‘Third Culture Kids’ (TCKs), ‘Adult TCKs’ (Pollock and Van Reken 1999) or ‘Global nomads’ amongst other terms. A key feature of the TCK literature and common characteristics amongst research participants is the perception of oneself as being ‘different’. A move, or a change in location (city, country) also often leads them to experience ‘difference’ differently, and consequently, to perceive themselves differently. This articulation of difference is influenced by four key factors: a) Looks and appearances; or how one physically represents oneself as being part of a ‘majority’ or ‘minority’ in the population in which one lives for the time being; b) One’s understanding and knowledge of the common norms, idioms and social myths in that new environment; c) The perception of one’s own marginality, and their capacity to form roots, to forge a sense of belonging and a sense of ‘home’; and finally, d) the local political context; the State’s discourse on the management of difference.
Having had to relocate several times from their birth to early adult years, TCKs’ identity struggles are further summed up by the cosmopolitan expression ‘to be International’. This is described as being at ease with people from a variety of cultural backgrounds. What constitutes ‘sameness’, ‘difference’ and ‘cultural diversity’ is thus questionable because these constructs are extremely flexible, and are often articulated regardless of national, ethnic or linguistic particularities.
In this chapter, we will draw on data collected over a period of 18 months of ethnographic fieldwork and participant-observations in and around the communities of two International Baccalaureate (IB) schools in Melbourne, Australia and in Singapore. By interrogating participant’s claims to cosmopolitanism and “openness to diversity” (Hannerz 1996), this chapter will seek to untangle the tensions and contradictions associated with determining categories of ‘difference’ and ‘similarity’. We are specifically interested in participant’s experience of transitioning from an ‘international bubble’ to a multicultural city. Using Kosnick’s (2009) distinction of cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism, we argue that for research participants in Melbourne, the perception of difference and sameness is influenced by academic, governmental and popular discourses on Australian multiculturalism. In Singapore, where most participants have settled and lived inside expatriate or ‘international bubbles’, categories of difference are influenced by discourses on cosmopolitanism. I demonstrate that the processes of categorisation and access to group membership lie within complex dynamics of local class boundaries, which TCKs have to learn to negotiate every time they settle in a new city.